LABOUR'S LIES HAVE BROUGHT THE UK TO RUIN

LABOUR'S rhetoric on immigration is a colossal exercise in deceit.

Ministers are fond of talking tough, endlessly boasting of “crackdowns” and “robust new rules” on entry.

But in reality they have presided over the wilful collapse of our borders and the destruction of our british identity.

Our once well-ordered, cohesive nation has been turned into an overcrowded land full of disparate cultures. As the influx of foreigners continues at an unprecedented rate, many britons increasingly feel like aliens in their own country.

Labour’s spectacular dishonesty on this issue has been highlighted again by a series of announcements from the Home secretary alan Johnson. a former postman, Johnson likes to think of himself as Labour’s “man of the people”, all amiable grins and cheeky wisecracks. But in truth he is just another hypocritical socialist politician bent on the destruction of our british heritage.

His barrage of policy changes, launched with fanfare today, is as bogus as the immigrant marriage racket that his party has encouraged.

He declares that more stringent tests will be set for the award of british citizenship, this from the head of a Home office which has dished out British passports like confetti in recent years.

On present trends, thanks to Labour’s deliberate laxness, more than 200,000 migrants will become British citizens this year.

One of Johnson’s supposed new requirements will be that applicants for citizenship will have to prove their patriotic credentials.

On that basis, all of the current Cabinet would fail, such is the level of their treachery.

Over the past 12 years, the Government has been engaged in a vicious cultural war against the concept of British patriotism. Labour’s obsession with diversity means that our civic institutions have traduced our history, smashed our traditions and treated our instinctive national pride as a dangerous form of racism.

With the same duplicity, Johnson declares that, in the spirit of “fair play”, migrants will be stopped from queue-jumping for state housing.

If Labour really meant this, it would be an admission that the whole social housing system is biased in favour of migrants, something that british taxpayers have known for years though the Government has always tried to deny it. but Johnson’s announcement is just more empty words.

The Government has no intention of implementing such a policy, not least because of the Human rights act of 1998, that charter for spongers and anti-british campaigners, and Harriet Harman’s new Equality legislation, which makes it compulsory for public authorities to practise overt discrimination in favour of ethnic minorities.

The same is true of Johnson’s promise to end the use of marriage as a means to gaining settlement in britain and access to welfare. this is a practice particularly common among families from India, Pakistan and nigeria, where oppressed, bullied wives are used to milk the benefits.

What is sickening about Johnson’s announcement is that his Labour party cynically abolished in 1997 the Primary Purpose rule, which stopped immigrants using marriage as a means of obtaining british residency.

Labour presented the rule’s abolition as a triumph for compassion and justice but in practice it has opened the floodgates for migration from asia and africa, as well as imposing a huge new burden on social security.

But Labour did not care, for thereal reason behind this move was to boost the party’s votes in its seats in the Midlands and the north by importing large numbers of ethnic minority electors.

There is a fascinating passage in the published diary of Chris Mullin, the former Labour Minister, in which he writes,
“We’ve barely touched the rackets that surround arranged marriages. The trouble is that we are terrified of the huge cry of ‘racism’ that would go up the moment anyone breathed a word. There is the added difficulty that at least 20 Labour seats depend on asian votes.”

That comment says it all. Political expediency allied to multi-cultural dogma means that Labour will never do anything to halt the tidal wave of immigration.

Under Brown and Johnson our border controls will remain feeble and our welfare system a honeypot for migrants.

Only last weekend it emerged that an illegal immigrant had managed to smuggle himself into britain in a coach full of border agency officials returning from Calais. The incident was a perfect metaphor for the shambles of frontier controls under Labour.

But Labour’s stance on immigration can now be seen as a gigantic lie. We were told that a mass influx of foreigners, currently running at over 500,000 a year, would be the engine of economic prosperity.

The opposite is true. The greater the levels of mass migration, the deeper we sink into economic misery.

Our public services are buckling under the strain of over-crowding, our welfare system has become hopelessly unaffordable.

The idea that all migrants come here to work hard is just a myth. In fact migrants are far more likely than British people to be unemployed, in receipt of benefits or housed in state-funded accommodation.

Meanwhile our society is now beset by extremism, barbaric violence, ethnic tensions and superstition. But for Labour, this is not a badge of shame.

Mass immigration has achieved its goal. No matter what Johnson says today, his party has succeeded in ruining our once gentle, united land.

Source : Daily Express (By Leo McKinstry)

White Flight

The title of this post is “White Flight”… it’s a term first coined in the United States. It characterises the failure of “The Diversity Experiment”…..

It tells the story of how an indigenous population, sell up and move away from the larger towns and cities of their birth, to escape being swallowed in a sea of unwanted, unwarranted and uncontrolled immigration.

White flight has become a serious issue in the UK, as educated and skilled Britons leave for the suburbs, city outskirts and foreign shores. This is not always a voluntary departure, this is an upheaval that most would have loved to avoid. After all, it means moving from a lifetime of familiarity and often extended family. Abandoning all that they have known, their friends, their home, their memories, their history and their roots.

This is a move that has been forced upon them and their families. In Labour’s “Multicultural Utopia”, life is not as it should be. White flight is not spoken about by politicians, especially by the instigators of this mass experiment, because they are guilty of the act themselves. They do however, condemn us doing it!

Why? Bengali’s, Pakistani’s and Chinese tend to live in close knit communities, why aren’t white people allowed to?

The simple answer to that is, it would ruin their experiment.

That’s not what they wanted for the proletariat, they wanted us to live in harmony with Somalis, Poles, Vietnamese and Bangladeshi’s, even though they were not willing to do so themselves. They wanted to say to the world’s unfortunate, destitute underdogs “look we are British, see how generous and happy we are for you to come and live amongst us, we will treat you as though you are one of our own”.

It’s comfortable being benevolent when you don’t include yourself in the equation! It’s acceptable when you can afford a private school for your children where you know they will thrive. The factory worker's son has to go to a "community" state school, where most of the children don’t speak English.

It’s justifiable that your children get good grades and go to University, when his son has done so badly, the only option is for him is to sign on the dole or join the army.

After all, who is going to die in your illegal wars? Not your son!

What isn’t appropriate, is if his family relocate to a “white area” where the schools are still able to concentrate on teaching, rather than ensuring that the immigrant children first learn English. It’s objectionable for the factory worker to want the best for his son too, how dare he! He doesn’t want his son to grow up in an area where young criminals carry knives, mug old ladies and drugs are dealt on street corners either.

You see, if WE do that, we’re racist. If we try to ensure certain areas remain white for us, we are racist.

In Labour’s experiment, we are meant to be “enriched” by living in a diverse community. Trevor Phillips, head of the Commission for Racial Equality said there was a disturbing trend towards schools being either mainly white or mainly black. He blamed “white flight”. He was concerned that ethnic minority children were losing out because of the phenomena. Minority children losing out, what about OUR children?

It's the white people's fault again, we are to blame. We're not participating in your left wing experiment. We don't want to be part of your great diverse utopia!

Mr Phillips, it might have helped if we had been asked if it was OK for large swathes of our country to be invaded by foreigners. Nobody bothered to ask US what we thought and now you have found out that most of us don’t actually like the idea.

Well, Mr Phillips, tough!

The righteous will say I am being racist. The righteous live in areas that are NOT diverse or enriched. They live in the country towns of middle England, their children attend schools where immigrants are a minority. Do you really think that it’s fair that we force white children to attend a school consisting mainly of immigrant children?

Our schools have already been altered to such an extent that they cater for minority children’s needs rather than our own. Christian assemblies have been abolished incase they offend someone. Christmas is no longer celebrated and English children are being politically conditioned to accept the "Diversity Experiment".

Ah, but we are silenced….speak out and you are racist, so what do we do? If we are fortunate enough, we move. If not, we are trapped in that shambles that Labour has created in the name of socialism.

Socialism, where all are equal except the political and upper classes.

… and those white indigenous British that cannot escape, become the real victims of your little experiment....and in my books, that tantamount to treason.

Albion

Pullman's article was pulled from Times Online within a day of being published earlier this year but it's still available, online. Here is his powerful prose, in full, and this is why he's feared; this is why they try to discredit him. Read and weep for our loss and for the uphill struggle ahead:

Are such things done on Albion’s shore?

The image of this nation that haunts me most powerfully is that of the sleeping giant Albion in William Blake’s prophetic books. Sleep, profound and inveterate slumber: that is the condition of Britain today.

We do not know what is happening to us. In the world outside, great events take place, great figures move and act, great matters unfold, and this nation of Albion murmurs and stirs while malevolent voices whisper in the darkness - the voices of the new laws that are silently strangling the old freedoms the nation still dreams it enjoys.

We are so fast asleep that we don’t know who we are any more. Are we English? Scottish? Welsh? British? More than one of them? One but not another? Are we a Christian nation - after all we have an Established Church - or are we something post-Christian? Are we a secular state? Are we a multifaith state? Are we anything we can all agree on and feel proud of?

The new laws whisper:

You don’t know who you are;
You’re mistaken about yourself;
We know better than you do what you consist of, what labels apply to you, which facts about you are important and which are worthless;
We do not believe you can be trusted to know these things, so we shall know them for you;
And if we take against you, we shall remove from your possession the only proof we shall allow to be recognised.

The sleeping nation dreams it has the freedom to speak its mind. It fantasises about making tyrants cringe with the bluff bold vigour of its ancient right to express its opinions in the street. This is what the new laws say about that:

Expressing an opinion is a dangerous activity;
Whatever your opinions are, we don’t want to hear them,
So if you threaten us or our friends with your opinions we shall treat you like the rabble you are.
And we do not want to hear you arguing about it;
So hold your tongue and forget about protesting;
What we want from you is acquiescence.

The nation dreams it is a democratic state where the laws were made by freely elected representatives who were answerable to the people. It used to be such a nation once, it dreams, so it must be that nation still. It is a sweet dream.

You are not to be trusted with laws;
So we shall put ourselves out of your reach;
We shall put ourselves beyond your amendment or abolition;
You do not need to argue about any changes we make, or to debate them, or to send your representatives to vote against them;
You do not need to hold us to account.
You think you will get what you want from an inquiry?
Who do you think you are?
What sort of fools do you think we are?

The nation’s dreams are troubled, sometimes: dim rumours reach our sleeping ears, rumours that all is not well in the administration of justice; but an ancient spell murmurs through our somnolence, and we remember that the courts are bound to seek the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, and we turn over and sleep soundly again.

And the new laws whisper:
We do not want to hear you talking about truth.
Truth is a friend of yours, not a friend of ours.
We have a better friend called hearsay, who is a witness we can always rely on.
We do not want to hear you talking about innocence;
Innocent means guilty of things not yet done.
We do not want to hear you talking about the right to silence.
You need to be told what silence means: it means guilt.
We do not want to hear you talking about justice;
Justice is whatever we want to do to you,
And nothing else.

Are we conscious of being watched, as we sleep? Are we aware of an ever-open eye at the corner of every street, of a watching presence in the very keyboards we type our messages on? The new laws don’t mind if we are. They don’t think we care about it.

We want to watch you day and night.
We think you are abject enough to feel safe when we watch you.
We can see you have lost all sense of what is proper to a free people.
We can see you have abandoned modesty.
Some of our friends have seen to that.

They have arranged for you to find modesty contemptible.
In a thousand ways they have led you to think that whoever does not want to be watched must have something shameful to hide.

We want you to feel that solitude is frightening and unnatural.
We want you to feel that being watched is the natural state of things.

One of the pleasant fantasies that consoles us in our sleep is that we are a sovereign nation, and safe within our borders. This is what the new laws say about that:

We know who our friends are
And when our friends want to have words with one of you
We shall make it easy for them to take you away to a country where you will learn that you have more fingernails than you need
It will be no use bleating that you know of no offence you have committed under British law
It is for us to know what your offence is.
Angering our friends is an offence

It is inconceivable to me that a waking nation in the full consciousness of its freedom would have allowed its government to pass such laws as the Protection from Harassment Act (1997), the Crime and Disorder Act (1998), the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (2000), the Terrorism Act (2000), the Criminal Justice and Police Act (2001), the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act (2001), the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Extension Act (2002), the Criminal Justice Act (2003), the Extradition Act (2003), the Anti-Social Behaviour Act (2003), the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act (2004), the Civil Contingencies Act (2004), the Prevention of Terrorism Act (2005), the Inquiries Act (2005), the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act (2005), not to mention a host of pending legislation such as the Identity Cards Bill, the Coroners and Justice Bill, and the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill.

Inconceivable.

And those laws say:

Sleep, you stinking cowards,
Sweating as you dream of rights and freedoms.
Freedom is too hard for you;
We shall decide what freedom is
Sleep, you vermin.
Sleep, you scum.


I suggest everyone keep a copy of Pullman's article & spread it far and wide.

Unemployment and Immigration

UNEMPLOYMENT has soared to a 14-year high of nearly 2.4million, according to official figures released yesterday. They showed that 281,000 people joined the ranks of the jobless in the three months to May.

It was the biggest quarterly rise on record – and business leaders warned it could get worse, with 3.2million out of work next year.

The figures also raised fresh concerns about the impact of mass immigration. They showed the number of migrants working in Britain is still rising. The number of people born overseas in employment was 3.81million in March – up 129,000 in a year.

Meanwhile Gordon and Alan Johnson can sleep at night knowing that immigration and unemployment are rising, but they are never likely to be white, poor and living on a sink estate in an inner city that doesn't resemble anything like the hometown they used to know.

Migrants received the thumbs-up to make a beeline for Britain yesterday from Gordon Brown. The Prime Minister refused to shut the door on our open borders policy, claiming immigration was great for Britain.

And he ruled out imposing any sort of cap to limit the UK’s exploding population.

His comments will fuel fears that Britain is storing up an immigration timebomb. He spelled out how Britain will keep welcoming migrants when he addressed senior MPs yesterday.


But officials predict the population will explode to 70 million within 20 years.

Mr Brown told the Commons Liasion Committee yesterday: Let’s get the balance right here.

"We want those people that come to our country to have a contribution they can make to our country". Trouble is, they don’t all make a contribution. There isn’t enough work for the existing population and this will make matters far worse.

He claimed new measures would reduce immigrant numbers, saying: The numbers coming into our country to work will be less this year as a result of the changes we have made.

Critics of Labour’s border controls said the remarks proved Government immigration policy was in chaos.

He added: I’m happy to live in a multicultural society.

Well, he and his family are not likely to be directly affected by it, are they?

Middle Class White People to Blame!

Astonishingly, that’s what we’re being told for the lack of primary school places in England.

The LGA has just released the results of a survey they sent out to local councils and the conclusion they have come to is, “The recession is being blamed for an increased pressure on school places in the last six months by almost one in five councils”.

It continues “Possible causes include a reduction in the number of parents paying for private education, and families who would normally move out of major cities when their children reach school age being unable to sell their homes because of the standstill in the housing market”.

Yes, that’s correct.

Middle class white people are not selling up and moving out of the cities and they are not opting for private education, how selfish we can be!

The BBC continues along this farcical line “One reason may be parents abandoning private education to save money” and “Paralysis in the housing market also means fewer families are moving house when their children reach school age”. It begrudgingly adds “Immigration is also likely to have an impact on demand for places”.

Ed West, a telegraph blogger, hits the nail on the head when he says “in fact immigration is overwhelmingly the biggest cause of the increase, as this newspaper reports today. In the last eight years the number of births to foreign mothers has increased by 64 per cent; at the same time birth rates among British-born mothers rose by 6 per cent. That’s nationwide - you can double that first figure in London, and while in Richmond and Kingston the sudden unaffordability of private education may be a factor, it’s quite clear none of the new arrivals in the schools in my part of town are called Tarquin or Arabella”.

The figures above are backed up by a report today from “Balanced Migration”. It’s entitled “Immigration a major reason for pressure on primary school places”. Ministers misleading the public.


Actually, they are failing to mislead the public, we know the truth. In actual fact, applications to private schools have risen. "Almost two children are now applying for every place at schools represented by the elite Headmasters' and Headmistresses Conference, said the study. Heads said the rise underlined the scale of frustration felt by many parents towards state schools under Labour"

Uncontrolled immigration and the tendency for ethnic minority women to have more children than their white counterparts, are largely responsible for our school system breakdown.

The fact that one class may have children that speak 15 or 20 different languages and not a word of English is unacceptable. It is without doubt the main reason for the failure of our school system.

Many white children, especially boys are suffering as a result of schools being told to concentrate on ethnic minorities. Research produced for the Department for Children, Schools and Families, found that white boys were at the bottom of the league, just above gypsy and romany boys.

It is time things changed. We will no longer stay silent. We, of the alliance, damn this Government for allowing the breakdown of our education system.

These are BRITISH schools. These are OUR SCHOOLS and you have ruined countless white children’s futures, all in the name of equality.

We demand that the Government ensures that ALL children speak fluent English before they are allowed to attend a mainstream school. Since this Government has been in power, we have been witness to an extraordinary dumbing down of examinations and qualifications. Qualifications that used to mean something, are now considered a joke and not a measure of a childs ability, but the ability of this government to cheat!

All in the name of equality. We want equal rights for our youngsters.

Our children are suffering and we are enraged.